The scandal of reason : a critical theory of political judgment /
Theories of justice struggle to balance vision and practicality. As with Habermas, the more demanding the ideal of justice, the less connected the theory is to political reality; as with Rawls, the more politically realistic the theory, the weaker its normative criteria, rendering the theory unrelia...
| Kaituhi matua: | |
|---|---|
| Hōputu: | Licensed eBooks |
| Reo: | Ingarihi |
| I whakaputaina: |
New York :
Columbia University Press
[2012]
|
| Rangatū: | New directions in critical theory.
|
| Urunga tuihono: | https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/azma15380 |
Rārangi ihirangi:
- Preface
- Introduction: the scandal of reason and the paradox of judgment
- Political judgment and the vocation of critical theory
- Critical theory: political judgment as ideologiekritik
- Philosophical liberalism: reasonable judgment
- Liberalism and critical theory in dispute
- Judgment unbound: Arendt
- From critique of power to a theory of critical judgment
- The political epistemology of judgment
- The critical consensus model
- Judgment, criticism, innovation
- Conclusion: letting go of ideal theory.