Fairness and rights in international criminal procedure /
Through an in-depth critical analysis of procedural decisions at the ICTY and ICC between 2008 and 2018, Rigney shows that there is a clear separation between fairness and rights in practice. She demonstrates tthat fairness is invoked in international criminal law decisions in inconsistent ways that...
| Kaituhi matua: | |
|---|---|
| Hōputu: | Licensed eBooks |
| Reo: | Ingarihi |
| I whakaputaina: |
Edinburgh :
Edinburgh University Press,
[2022]
|
| Urunga tuihono: | https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctv2rcnpvx |
Rārangi ihirangi:
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Why fairness and rights matter, and what this book sets out to do
- 1 The particular place of international criminal trials: aims and procedure
- 2 The centrality of rights and fairness in international criminal trials
- 3 The incoherence of fairness in international criminal trials
- 4 Fairness, the rights of the accused and disclosure
- 5 Fairness, the rights of the accused and the use of adjudicated facts
- 6 Fairness, the rights of the accused and the protection of witnesses
- Conclusions: Closing the space between fairness and rights, and reimaging the future of international criminal law
- Bibliography
- Index