The role of legal argumentation and human dignity in constitutional courts : proceedings of the special workshops held at the 28th World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy in Lisbon, 2017 /
| Kaituhi rangatōpū: | |
|---|---|
| Ētahi atu kaituhi: | , , , , |
| Hōputu: | Licensed eBooks |
| Reo: | Ingarihi |
| I whakaputaina: |
Stuttgart :
Franz Steiner Verlag,
2019.
|
| Rangatū: | Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie. Beiheft ;
157. |
| Urunga tuihono: | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=2182484 |
Rārangi ihirangi:
- Intro; Contents; Introduction; Part I: The Role of Legal Argumentation in Constitutional Courts; Giovanni Damele: Naturalistic Argument and Appeal to Common Sense in Constitutional Argumentation; Rachel Herdy: Appeals to Expert Opinion in High Courts; Fernando Leal: "Less is More": Against Argumentative Saturation in Legal Decision-Making; Thomas Bustamante: Abusive Obiter Dicta: A Typology of Illegitimate Judicial Pronouncements; Chiara Valentini: Rights, Proportionalism and Inclusive Adjudication
- Alberto Puppo: Local Priority in Constitutional Argumentation: Threat or Healthy Contribution to International Law?Part II: The Use of Human Dignity within Judicial Argumentation; Miguel Nogueira de Brito: Is there Any Absolute Concept of Dignity?; Pedro Moniz Lopes: Interpretative and Normative Ambivalences of Human Dignity: Rights, Dignity and Morality in Fleming V Ireland; Jorge Silva Sampaio: Human Dignity's Contestedness, Analytical Reconstruction of the Prohibition of Instrumentalization and a Reassessment of the Aviation Security Act Case
- Mariana Melo Egídio: The Argument from Human Dignity
- Legal Paternalism and Restriction on Fundamental RightsEditors and Contributors