Analytic versus continental : arguments on the methods and value of philosophy /
Throughout much of the twentieth century, the relationship between analytic and continental philosophy has been one of disinterest, caution or hostility. Recent debates in philosophy have highlighted some of the similarities between the two approaches and even envisaged a post-continental and post-a...
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| مؤلفون آخرون: | |
| التنسيق: | Licensed eBooks |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| منشور في: |
Abingdon, Oxon ; New York :
Routledge,
2014.
|
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=924337 |
| الملخص: | Throughout much of the twentieth century, the relationship between analytic and continental philosophy has been one of disinterest, caution or hostility. Recent debates in philosophy have highlighted some of the similarities between the two approaches and even envisaged a post-continental and post-analytic philosophy. Opening with a history of key encounters between philosophers of opposing camps since the late nineteenth century - from Frege and Husserl to Derrida and Searle - the book goes on to explore in detail the main methodological differences between the two approaches. This covers a v. |
|---|---|
| وصف المادة: | Originally published: Acumen, 2011. |
| وصف مادي: | 1 online resource |
| بيبلوغرافيا: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| ردمك: | 9781317491934 1317491939 9781315711430 1315711435 9781844652440 |