Bureaucratic landscapes : interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity /
Political scientists have long been concerned about the tension between institutional fragmentation and policy coordination in the U.S. bureaucracy. The literature is rife with examples of agencies competing with each other or asserting their independence, while cooperation is relatively rare. This...
| Hoofdauteur: | |
|---|---|
| Formaat: | Licensed eBooks |
| Taal: | Engels |
| Gepubliceerd in: |
Cambridge, Mass. :
MIT Press,
©2003.
|
| Reeks: | Politics, science, and the environment.
|
| Online toegang: | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=81095 |
Inhoudsopgave:
- Machine generated contents note: 1. Fragmented Jurisdictions, Fragmented Habitat
- 2. What Cooperation Means to Agency Officials
- 3. Emergence of Cooperation among Agency Directors
- 4. Institutionalizing Cooperation
- 5. Klamath Bioregion: Local Cooperation and the Demise of the Bioregional Ideal
- 6. South Coast Bioregion: Making Cooperation Work through Regulation
- 7. San Joaquin Valley Bioregion: BLM's Co-operation Strategy Fails at the Bioregional Level
- 8. Explaining Interagency Cooperation: Or, Why the BLM Cooperates More Than the NPS
- App. B Memorandum of Understanding on Biological Diversity
- App. C Statement of Intent to Support the Agreement on Biological Diversity.