The Habermas-Rawls debate /
In the 1990s, Jürgen Habermas and John Rawls had a famous exchange in the Journal of Philosophy. In this book, James Gordon Finlayson examines the Habermas-Rawls debate in context and considers its wider implications
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Licensed eBooks |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
New York :
Columbia University Press
[2019]
|
| Online Access: | https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/finl16410 |
Table of Contents:
- Much ado about nothing
- Early debate
- Two nonrival theories of justice
- Habermas's early criticisms of Rawls
- Habermas's and Rawls's mature political theories
- Habermas between facts and norms
- Rawls's political liberalism
- The exchange
- Reconciliation through the public use of reason
- Reply to Habermas
- Reasonable versus true
- The legacy of the Habermas-Rawls dispute
- Religion in the bounds of public reason alone