Supreme Court confirmation hearings in the U.S. Senate : reconsidering the charade /
Critics claim that Supreme Court nominees have become more evasive in recent decades and that Senate confirmation hearings lack real substance. Conducting a line-by-line analysis of the confirmation hearing of every nominee since 1955-an original dataset of nearly 11,000 questions and answers from t...
| Autors principals: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Licensed eBooks |
| Idioma: | anglès |
| Publicat: |
Ann Arbor :
The University of Michigan Press
[2014]
|
| Accés en línia: | https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3998/mpub.5918574 |
Taula de continguts:
- A vapid and hollow charade?
- The hearings in historical perspective
- Coding the hearings
- Are Supreme Court nominees forthcoming?
- Polarized and televised: changes in committee voting since 1981
- The perception gap
- Can the hearings be improved? Do they need to be?