TY  - GEN
T1  - The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929
T2  - Landmark law cases & American society.
A1  - Lurie, Jonathan, 1939-
LA  - English
PP  - Lawrence, Kansas
PB  - University Press of Kansas
YR  - 2022
UL  - https://ebooks.jgu.edu.in/Record/jstor_dda_on1336986306
AB  - "According to the US Constitution, if a bill is not returned to Congress by the president after ten days of receiving it and Congress is adjourned, the bill is effectively vetoed. The so-called "pocket veto" dates at least as far back as the presidency of James Madison, but the constitutionality of its use had not been considered by the Supreme Court until Okanogan, Methow, San Poels...Indians v. the United States was decided in 1929, during the last year of Chief Justice Taft's tenure. Despite responding to a situation in American Indian Law, the Pocket Veto Case is notable for the fact its final decision had nothing whatsoever to do with Indian Law. The Okanogan Tribe is barely mentioned at all in the Court's unanimous opinion, delivered by Justice Edward Sanford, which ultimately concluded that the pocket veto is a constitutional exercise of presidential authority"--
CN  - KF5067 .L87 2022eb
SN  - 9780700633401
SN  - 0700633405
SN  - 9780700633395
KW  - Pocket veto : United States : Cases.
KW  - Indians of North America : Legal status, laws, etc. : Cases.
KW  - Veto de poche : États-Unis : Jurisprudence.
KW  - Legal History.
KW  - LAW.
KW  - Judicial Power.
KW  - Pocket veto
KW  - Indians of North America : Legal status, laws, etc.
KW  - United States
KW  - Okanogan, Methow, San Poelis, Nespelem, Colville, and Lake Indian Tribes v. United States, 279 U.S. 655 (1929)
KW  - Electronic books.
KW  - Trials, litigation, etc.
ER  -